From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2203a21a136b39cc
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Fortran's Equivalence
Date: 1997/03/26
Message-ID: <E7nrCJ.Kot@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 228522856
References: <333840D1.7B12@cae.ca> <dewar.859383980@merv>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.859383980@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>justification for it. If "use at" does what you want, use it!

But you might want to spell it using the preferred Ada 95 syntax:
"for X'Address use ...;".

(The original poster did he's using an Ada 95 compiler, right?)

- Bob