From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ea968aeb8c7f10d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Do I Really Need A Supervisor?
Date: 1997/03/14
Message-ID: <E71Jyp.C2B@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 225483397
References: <3327438E.942@earthlink.net> <E6zGF9.K5L@world.std.com>
 <os913rbfi0.fsf@ted.vigra.com> <dewar.858314379@merv>
Organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-03-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.858314379@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>That's right, although you need to remember to call adafinal as well,
>so you need a main program that says
>
>main ()
>{adainit(); adafinal():}
>
>And that is now 10.2(23) gets addressed if anyone needs this marginal
>feature!

Nah, nobody's going to do that.  I'd rather write "procedure main is
begin null; end;".

I'm not sure which feature you're calling "marginal" -- the lack of a
main procedure is essential (required) for shared-passive partitions.
Perhaps you mean "lack of a main, for an active partition" is marginal
-- which I would agree with.

- Bob