From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,794a4cb8f6cfe39b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kst@sd.aonix.com (Keith Thompson) Subject: Re: Clear Screen Date: 1997/03/03 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 222791851 Sender: news@thomsoft.com (USENET News Admin @flash) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: pulsar References: <330FE569.29FA@bix.com> <5erk3a$a29@news.cict.fr> <5f15dg$an@fozzie.sun3.iaf.nl> <3316EFA0.7970@watson.ibm.com> Organization: Aonix, San Diego, CA, USA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Originator: kst@pulsar Date: 1997-03-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <3316EFA0.7970@watson.ibm.com> "Norman H. Cohen" writes: [...] > (Concerning the ASCII package, I would take the trouble in new programs > to write > > with Ada.Characters.Latin_1; use Ada.Characters; > > This allows me to write Latin_1.Esc rather than ASCII.Esc, and, more > important, it allows me to write things such as > Latin_1.Registered_Trade_Mark_Sign.) This will also make any other declarations within Ada.Characters visible. (It happens that the only such declaration is the child package Ada.Characters.Handling, and that only if you "with" it.) If that's what you want to do, that's fine. Another way to do this is with Ada.Characters.Latin_1; ... package Latin_1 renames Ada.Characters.Latin_1; (I'm not trying to start another use clause flame war, just pointing out an alternative.) -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@sd.aonix.com <*> TeleSo^H^H^H^H^H^H Alsy^H^H^H^H Thomson Softw^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Aonix 10251 Vista Sorrento Parkway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA, USA, 92121-2706 "Humor is such a subjective thing." -- Cartagia