From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e5e3251cadf95289,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: mg@harp.camb.inmet.com (Mitch Gart)
Subject: X11Ada and GNAT 3.09
Date: 1997/02/28
Message-ID: <E6BqMJ.CCp.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 222118356
Sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: harp.camb.inmet.com
Organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-02-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


It was recently reported to me that X11Ada was not working with
GNAT 3.09 and also with the latest Aonix ObjectAda compiler.
However, I just tried X11Ada with GNAT 3.09 on Solaris.  I built 
the binding and executed the test programs with no problems.
If somebody out there has problems with X11Ada and GNAT 3.09
can you please send me the problems in private email?

I'll be looking at the Aonix problem soon.

- Mitch Gart
- mg@inmet.com