From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f1efe20cb462d89c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: drupp@cs.washington.edu (Douglas Rupp)
Subject: Re: gnat 3.07 DOS
Date: 1997/01/22
Message-ID: <E4FAIL.I2n@beaver.cs.washington.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 211605505
x-nntp-posting-host: june.cs.washington.edu
sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System)
references: <5c36l5$5u3@top.mitre.org>
organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U of Washington, Seattle
keywords: gnat 3.07 DOS EXE
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5c36l5$5u3@top.mitre.org>,
Michael F Brenner <mfb@mbunix.mitre.org> wrote:
>Things someone could look into: (A) Were the symbols REALLY stripped
>from the runtime routines?

The DOS 3.07 READ.ME addresses this.