From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6c434e6fc0d3ab95 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kst@aonix.com (Keith Thompson) Subject: Re: What good is Ada ??? Date: 1997/01/08 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 208695684 sender: news@thomsoft.com (USENET News Admin @flash) x-nntp-posting-host: pulsar references: <32D067C8.3920@etsu-tn.edu> <19970107014700.UAA14671@ladder01.news.aol.com> organization: Aonix, San Diego, CA, USA newsgroups: comp.lang.ada originator: kst@pulsar Date: 1997-01-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In <19970107014700.UAA14671@ladder01.news.aol.com> wolfmtnrch@aol.com (WolfMtnRch) writes: [...] > And if that's > not good enough, I know of one Ada95 vender whose compiler will generate > Java. To be precise, it generates Java bytecode, not Java. It's unfortunate that the high level language Java and the low level (typically interpreted) byte code to which it is typically compiled are referred to by the same name. There's no necessary relationship between the two. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@aonix.com <*> TeleSo^H^H^H^H^H^H Alsy^H^H^H^H Thomson Softw^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Aonix 10251 Vista Sorrento Parkway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA, USA, 92121-2706 "SPOON!" -- The Tick