From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3ca574fc2007430 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kst@aonix.com (Keith Thompson) Subject: Re: Ada and Automotive Industry Date: 1996/12/18 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 204683696 sender: news@thomsoft.com (USENET News Admin @flash) x-nntp-posting-host: pulsar references: <32B197A6.2781E494@escmail.orl.lmco.com> organization: Aonix, San Diego, CA, USA newsgroups: comp.lang.ada originator: kst@pulsar Date: 1996-12-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > T.E.D. says > "Hmmm. Can I take this to mean that it is not a good idea to raise > predefined exceptions manually? Are predefined exceptions somehow > handled differently than user-defined ones?" > > Yes, see RM 11.6 But 11.6 refers only to exceptions raised by predefined checks. A predefined exception raised "manually" by an explicit raise statement (or by a call to Ada.Exceptions.Raise_Exception) is semantically no different than a user-defined exception raised the same way. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@aonix.com <*> TeleSo^H^H^H^H^H^H Alsy^H^H^H^H Thomson Softw^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Aonix 10251 Vista Sorrento Parkway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA, USA, 92121-2706 "SPOON!" -- The Tick