From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,978f50245fc02645
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Slice and Unbounded String
Date: 1996/12/01
Message-ID: <E1prut.2L3@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 201643760
references: <01bbdc70$2e557160$262a6282@cln49ae> <E1JKuL.HFp@world.std.com>
 <dewar.849335191@merv>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-12-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.849335191@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>P.S. In Strings.Unbounded, what on earth is
>
>7      type String_Access is access all String;
>       procedure Free (X : in out String_Access);

Somebody stuck this in at the last minute, just as a convenience.

>I could see providing these standard delcarations in Ada.Strings, but
>not in Ada.Strings.Unbounded.

Yeah, that would probably make more sense.

- Bob