From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed16b323e88cf5a3 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-10 11:10:50 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 References: From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Subject: Security Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:07:43 +0500 Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Mar 2003 19:10:49 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1047323449 news.gradwell.net 66673 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35146 Date: 2003-03-10T19:10:49+00:00 List-Id: In article , Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > In article , porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes: >> In article , >> Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes: > > Why do you want physical media ? > > Security policies that forbid copying software over the Internet. If I will sign by 2048 bit GnuPG key is it a replacement for physical media? (Well, except of transferring the key itself. However if I'll upload it to central keyservers and sign with it my further messages here, is it OK? I'm not against making a CD, just ask.) P.S. As we posters in c.l.a deal with security so much, shouldn't we introduce the "spoken rule" to digitally sign messages? Maybe we should have our own keyserver at a place like AdaPower?