From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9bf6617358567a9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-09 23:42:48 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news-peer.gradwell.net!not-for-mail Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 References: From: porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) Subject: Re: Commercial license? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:42:06 +0500 Organization: Extreme Code Software (http://ex-code.com) X-URL: http://www.ex-code.com/ NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Mar 2003 07:42:47 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.149.39.13 X-Trace: 1047282167 news.gradwell.net 66672 mail2news/195.149.39.13 X-Complaints-To: news-abuse@gradwell.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35114 Date: 2003-03-10T07:42:47+00:00 List-Id: In article , "Robert C. Leif" writes: > Please go to Newporinstruments.com and switch to Ada_Med or directly to > http://www.newportinstruments.com/ada_med/ada_med.html and download the > first item, which is the latest version of the ADA DEVELOPERS = > COOPERATIVE > LICENSE. Are there anywhere in Internet a concise informal reformulating of what is said in the license itself? From the first glance it is even not simple to understand whether the license permits binary commercial (arbitrary licensed) software using a library licensed under ADCL? Also they say something about that I can request a percentage of money from profit of selling such a software. Yes? Would this not prevent customers from buying my software?!