From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4576669b9167cd1d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: NVRAM or how can I enforce a range check in Ada83.
Date: 1996/11/19
Message-ID: <E14C7L.HoH@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 197426209
references: <9611150709.AA09539@algol.ocag.ch> <dewar.848229223@merv>
 <E11BHD.8yA@world.std.com> <dewar.848351899@merv>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.848351899@merv>, Robert Dewar <dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu> wrote:
>In accordance with 1.1.3(1,4), this compiler identifies program units
>that contain errors by not generating an object file for any such units.

Yeah, but GNAT would have to be substantially redesigned to support this
feature, since it doesn't generate object files for some legal files.

;-)

- Bob