From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,808505c9db7d5613
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Looking for good Ada95 book
Date: 1996/11/06
Message-ID: <E0GtqB.LMq@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 194933850
references: <32723F6A.54A3@dtek.chalmers.se> <55955a$n04@felix.seas.gwu.edu>
 <dewar.846952540@merv> <55kmtp$3s3@top.mitre.org>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <55kmtp$3s3@top.mitre.org>,
Michael F Brenner <mfb@mbunix.mitre.org> wrote:
>I was not asked what my opinion was before forming this imaginary
>consensus, ...

Sure you were.  The Ada 9X process was public, and anybody was allowed
to comment.  We got *lots* of comments.

- Bob