From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8dea6f46dfb95f66
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Environment variables
Date: 1996/11/02
Message-ID: <E09KGu.9BF@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 194051339
references: <55819q$mql@newslink.runet.edu>
 <ws94tjbhlg1.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu> <327A0B58.65C4@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <ws9aft1vgse.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <ws9aft1vgse.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>,
Laurent Guerby <guerby@gnat.com> wrote:
>...Note that, technically speaking, it's legal
>for an implementation to provide a completly different
>Ada.Command_Line than the one listed in the RM, as per RM-A.15(21):

Only if it is "appropriate" to do so.  ;-)

>RM> 			     Implementation Permissions
>RM> 
>RM> 21   An alternative declaration is allowed for package Command_Line if
>RM> different functionality is appropriate for the external execution
>RM> environment.

- Bob