From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4bc0e5c544f4d1eb,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: michiel.perdeck@tip.nl (Michiel Perdeck)
Subject: question on variant record
Date: 1996/11/02
Message-ID: <E090tr.Kru@tip.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 194090028
sender: news@tip.nl (The News User)
x-nntp-posting-host: utrecht42.pop.tip.nl
organization: CMG
reply-to: michiel.perdeck@cmg.nl
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-11-02T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


This is one of several questions on Ada95. I have split them over a
few messages so that reactions may be given to individual questions.

Can the tag field in a variant record (the field that determines the
actual type of the record) be queried just like a normal field? It
makes sense that it cannot be set afterwards but one should want to
request it's actual value, I suppose.

Regards,
Michiel Perdeck

Michiel Perdeck
CMG AT Finance, Amstelveen, Netherlands
michiel.perdeck@cmg.nl
michiel.perdeck@tip.nl