From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9908b67b1527416e,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: michiel.perdeck@tip.nl (Michiel Perdeck)
Subject: runtime efficiency
Date: 1996/10/26
Message-ID: <DzvosE.5MF@tip.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 192204289
sender: news@tip.nl (The News User)
x-nntp-posting-host: utrecht94.pop.tip.nl
organization: CMG
reply-to: michiel.perdeck@cmg.nl
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I think that Ada can produce code that runs as fast as C++ code and is
nevertheless safer. But someone said that at least part of it's safety
must come from run-time checks, that inevitable slow down.
What do you think?

Regards, Michiel.