From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ccb707f4c91a5f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Why no Propagates?
Date: 1996/10/18
Message-ID: <DzH8KL.5F7@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 190321485
references: <325D7F9B.2A8B@gte.net> <ROGOFF.96Oct14095012@sccm.Stanford.EDU>
 <326391B6.4B23@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <mheaney-ya023180001710961746550001@news.ni.net>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <mheaney-ya023180001710961746550001@news.ni.net>,
Matthew Heaney <mheaney@ni.net> wrote:
>To the designers of Ada 95: Was this feature considered for inclusion?

No, not that I recall.  There was a great deal of resistance to the
changes that *were* made to exceptions (like attaching strings to them).

>...Is
>it a candidate for inclusion in Ada 0X?

I suppose it might be.  Who knows?

- Bob