From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,45a9122ddf5fcf5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kst@thomsoft.com (Keith Thompson) Subject: Re: Valid Attribute and Unchecked Conversion Date: 1996/10/09 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 188356015 sender: news@thomsoft.com (USENET News Admin @flash) x-nntp-posting-host: pulsar references: <1996Oct1.100608.1@eisner> organization: Thomson Software Products, San Diego, CA, USA newsgroups: comp.lang.ada originator: kst@pulsar Date: 1996-10-09T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In dewar@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > Note that in practice, of course unchecked conversion followed by 'Valid > will work fine for the case of enumeration types with holes. This was > specifically intended as far as I am concerned, and the fact that the > final wordking of the RM contradicts this is a mistake that should be > fixed. I've sent a message to this effect to ada-comment. Maybe something will actually happen. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@thomsoft.com <*> TeleSoft^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Alsys^H^H^H^H^H Thomson Software Products 10251 Vista Sorrento Parkway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA, USA, 92121-2706 FIJAGDWOL