From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2cad261dc7af856
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Invalid page fault with gnat304a on Win95
Date: 1996/10/04
Message-ID: <Dyrr0D.EtD@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 187604973
references: <19961001002056.aaaa000RR@babyblue.cs.yale.edu>
 <01bbafc6$020b48e0$LocalHost@sfnp04h>
 <jcreem-0410961142090001@ljd155.sanders.lockheed.com>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <jcreem-0410961142090001@ljd155.sanders.lockheed.com>,
Jeff Creem <jcreem@mv.mv.com> wrote:
>I think the above will work but for something not quit that ugly you
>could have the test code run out of the context of a task. Define the
>task as a task type and set the 'Storage_Size of the task type to the
>appropriate value. 

This will work, but it seems like overkill to drag in the whole tasking
run-time system if the program is not already a multi-tasking program.

Also, you should use pragma Storage_Size, not the obsolete "for
T'Storage_Size use ..." notation.

- Bob