From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,45a9122ddf5fcf5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Rules for Representation of Subtypes
Date: 1996/10/01
Message-ID: <DyM9y3.2nD@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 186550761
references: <DyCF97.7zp@world.std.com> <52hnvh$li0@wdl1.wdl.lmco.com>
 <DyKC85.Gqx@world.std.com> <1996Oct1.100608.1@eisner>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <1996Oct1.100608.1@eisner>,
>So can someone give an example of how Z'Valid _might_ be useful
>after an unchecked conversion, as seems to be indicated by the
>Reference Manual.

If you unchecked_convert to a record (which is the usual case), then you
can usefully use 'Valid on the components.  Be sure that the record
doesn't contain fancy stuff (details in the RM), but a record containing
scalar fields and constrained arrays will work.

- Bob