From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-14 05:23:35 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Operating System
Date: 14 Mar 2002 07:14:04 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <DxCf+2YH8Vr+@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <a4u9d00vqe@enews2.newsguy.com>
 <3c77b476.322111671@news.cis.dfn.de> <a5dhmg$l1a$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <m4ro7uorulr8cfn9tn3hk30cqi7mf4egdc@4ax.com> <a62kmf$giv$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <o2td8ug1chantij2e6j80kk56mrafp6e78@4ax.com> <a6825a$75c$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <3C88E0D1.89161C16@despammed.com> <a6m8h5$rpb$1@helle.btinternet.com>
 <3C8F5D44.2E2E2EE7@despammed.com> <a6oi8n$fhe$1@helle.btinternet.com>
 <oZVpXxHs63ZX@eisner.encompasserve.org> <a6on6j$k69$1@paris.btinternet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1016111646 4215 192.135.80.34 (14 Mar 2002
 13:14:06 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:14:06 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21220
Date: 2002-03-14T07:14:04-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <a6on6j$k69$1@paris.btinternet.com>, "Pam Kelly" <al@adalinux.org> writes:
> Is it likely to be necessary to turn off Ada safety features in order to
> 'more or less' translate something like sendmail into Ada ?

Considering the number of defects found in sendmail over the years,
I do not think any wart-for-wart copy of it would be significantly
better, regardless of the implementation language.