From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c984a7f4a0ab0148 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey) Subject: Re: non key-words in xemacs to be upper case Date: 1996/08/29 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 177116469 references: <3218214F.419D@lmtas.lmco.com> newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: >This is a reaction to a strong reaction from Mike Feldman, who likes to >teach Ada using ALL UPPER CASE KEYWORDS, and that is the way his book is >written, but I strongly disagree with this, and it is interesting to note >that not ONE of my students chose to follow this style (I let them choose >their own style, as long as they are consistent). FWIW, I follow the Mike Feldman approach. Perhaps its my ALGOL 68 upbringing :-). What I certainly do NOT like is the opposite convention of using lower-case reserved words, as was done in the LRM. -- Charles H. Lindsey ------------------------------------------------------------- At Home, doing my own thing. Internet: chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk Voice/Fax: +44 161 437 4506 Janet: chl@uk.ac.man.cs.clw Snail: 5 Clerewood Ave., CHEADLE, SK8 3JU, U.K. UUCP: mucs!clerew!chl