From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,818bb9686cf8adae
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: drupp@cs.washington.edu (Douglas Rupp)
Subject: Re: Dec Ditching Ada?
Date: 1996/08/23
Message-ID: <DwKn8C.7wy@beaver.cs.washington.edu>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 175854202
x-nntp-posting-host: june.cs.washington.edu
sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System)
references: <4vi32h$bu1@jake.esu.edu> <1996Aug22.170624.1@eisner>
organization: Computer Science & Engineering, U of Washington, Seattle
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-08-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>For VMS DEC had a deal with someone to bring GNAT to Alpha only
>(VMS tools which don't also produce VAX code are not much use to
>commercial software vendors).

The deal is with Ada Core Technologies.

>
>For Windows NT (where DEC Ada never existed), I suppose one should
>look to traditional Ada vendors, but everything I have seen has been
>Intel-centric.

A.C.T. demonstrated this port at the last Tri-Ada.

Douglas Rupp