From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,124189fcae964f11 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!news.illinois.net!attcg1!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Command Line Argument Package Date: 27 Jul 2004 09:55:19 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1090940083 5569 192.135.80.34 (27 Jul 2004 14:54:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 14:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2416 Date: 2004-07-27T09:55:19-05:00 List-Id: In article , "Jeff C," writes: > I've posted a command line argument helper/utility package that I've had > around for a while. I've used it on a few small things and had intended to > clean it up some more and post it someday but it is already pretty useful. It would be better for your announcement of such to indicate what you mean by "command line argument" processing. Is this restricted to the "-this -THAT" Unix-style command lines ?