From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3bb18a1e628df747 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: stt@henning.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) Subject: Re: Visibility of package within package Date: 1996/08/01 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 171322564 sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news) x-nntp-posting-host: henning.camb.inmet.com references: <4tnv8b$6v0@gateway.marconi.ca> organization: Intermetrics, Inc. newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-08-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Erik Masella (emasella@mtl.marconi.ca) wrote: : Could anybody explain to me why the following will not work: : with Generic_Pkg; : package A_Pkg is : package B_Pkg is new Generic_Pkg(...); : .. : end A_Pkg; : -------------------------------- : with A_Pkg; : package body C_Pkg is : procedure Init is : begin : A_Pkg.B_Pkg.Do_Something(...); : end Init; : end C_Pkg; : ==> Why isn't B_Pkg visible within C_Pkg? From what I understand, : "Software Engineering with Ada" from Booch (2nd ed.) says at p.383 that : this is possible (but he did not use generics). : I'd greatly appreciate some insight into this. Your code looks OK, but it is hard to be sure without a complete example, since we don't know what is inside "Generic_Pkg". When you have mysteries like this, it is most useful to include an actual listing with error messages from the compiler. Surprisingly often, there is some other problem than the one you first suspect. In any case, it is possible that the compiler has a bug, but your example is so simple and straightforward that it seems more likely that something else is wrong. : Erik Masella : emasella@mtl.marconi.ca -Tucker Taft stt@inmet.com http://www.inmet.com/~stt/ Intermetrics, Inc. Cambridge, MA USA