From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ef1eb6f225fd0c9f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: spate of programming languages
Date: 1996/07/26
Message-ID: <Dv6B3I.K7o@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 170680843
references: <4tb9b6$9bl@hermes.acs.unt.edu> <31F93F02.23D2@sn.no>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <31F93F02.23D2@sn.no>, Aron Felix Gurski  <agurski@sn.no> wrote:
>... a registered trademark (unlike PL/1 up to PL/100). 

Are you saying that these are registered trademarks, presumably of IBM?
So that if I sell a language called PL/100, I'll get in trouble, but if
I sell PL/101, it's OK?

- Bob