From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ad62d6b425bebfec
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: "use" clauses and Ada 95 OOP
Date: 1996/07/23
Message-ID: <Dv0qA8.GzA@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 170375915
references: <SCHMID.96Jul22104727@alta.ide.com>
 <Duzwxx.8E1.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <ws9spajgc6m.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <ws9spajgc6m.fsf@schonberg.cs.nyu.edu>,
Laurent Guerby <guerby@gnat.com> wrote:
>Mitch>     pkg1.func(x)
>
>Mitch> calls the code that is in the body of pkg1.  The syntax in fact
>Mitch> implies that strongly.  [...]
>
>   This notation implies that the specification is in pkg1, and the
>specification is the important thing, since it's here I'll find the
>documentation (no need to look at the body ;-).

Well said.

- Bob