From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6161bc9aa025a9a3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Subunits of packages vs. subunits of subprograms
Date: 1996/07/21
Message-ID: <DuwKL6.Lsx@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 169944665
references: <DuDx0J.F5q.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 <31E534FE.12370608@jinx.sckans.edu> <dewar.837120671@schonberg>
 <31EA9976.5CD6@csehp3.mdc.com>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <31EA9976.5CD6@csehp3.mdc.com>,
James A. Squire <m193884@CSEHP3.MDC.COM> wrote:
>.... assuming that the only separates one uses are packages.  Some of us
>use separates for subprograms within a package, for the reasons implied
>by David Morton in his last posting on this thread, and so for us, child
>units certainly do not obsolete subunits "in many instances."

Library units (i.e. child units) can be procedures, too.

- Bob

P.S. IMHO most library units should be private library units.