From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a9844368dd0a842 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Subject: Re: seperate keyword and seperate compilation with Gnat? Date: 1996/07/21 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 169227333 references: <31D95D93.28D8D15B@jinx.sckans.edu> organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-21T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Jon S Anthony wrote: >In article bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) writes: >> The rules of the RM proper are entirely definitions and axioms. >> Anything that's a theorem is put in a NOTE, so you know it's not a >> basic fact, but can be derived from other facts. > >OK, fine. This makes sense. It would probably have been good to >actually state this point explicitly, but whatever (or maybe it is and >I just can't find it). RM-1.1.2 says it, especially (14..16). You have to know that "normative" and "informative" are ISO buzzwords meaning, basically, "definitions/axioms" and "theorems", respectively. If you've never read the ISO standard on standards, don't bother -- it's pretty boring. ;-) >Well, another thing that is very important is that often (in fact >typically) the theorems are more important than the axioms/defs. ... Agreed. ...[stuff about two volumes, etc] >volume". I suppose that was too much work. Oh well... Yeah, that's part of it. - Bob