From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,546b2e2a44f83809 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk) Subject: Re: Gnat For use at Question Date: 1996/07/15 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 168544248 references: <4s2eb5$qt6@masala.cc.uh.edu> organization: JerryWare HQ, Haarlem, Holland newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-07-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jon S Anthony (jsa@organon.com) wrote: : Sounds like what you are saying is that for the user model (of the : language and implementation in this case) the segmenation stuff is : hidden and thus irrelevant. True? Yes, as long as all data you are referencing is within your own program space. The video buffer (which Spasmo was trying to access) definitively is not. Regards, Jerry. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Jerry van Dijk -- e-mail: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl -- -- Banking Consultant -- Member Team-Ada -- -- Ordina Finance BV -- Located at Haarlem, The Netherlands --