From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a9844368dd0a842
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: seperate keyword and seperate compilation with Gnat?
Date: 1996/07/04
Message-ID: <Dtzzvv.67G@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 163626412
references: <31D95D93.28D8D15B@jinx.sckans.edu>
 <4rckva$dj1@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> <JSA.96Jul3200323@organon.com>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <JSA.96Jul3200323@organon.com>,
Jon S Anthony <jsa@organon.com> wrote:
>(16) goes on to say (oh, btw, what is the significance of the "4"
>prefix?)...

ISO required NOTES to be numbered.  So I obeyed.

ISO also required paragraphs to NOT be numbered.  Heh, heh, heh.
Anybody ever read the One True ISO Standard for ada?

- Bob