From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8de933d44255f226
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: stt@henning.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Re: Q: unboxed values and polymorphism
Date: 1996/06/17
Message-ID: <Dt4G2J.3J0.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 160547715
sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news)
x-nntp-posting-host: henning.camb.inmet.com
references: <Dt4FCx.29H.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-06-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Tucker Taft (stt@henning.camb.inmet.com) wrote:
: ...You might still find a use for unbounded
: polymorphism (i.e. tagged records), when you point to larger objects 
: which are not simply composted of list cells.
                       ^^^^^^^^^  Oops, "composed" (not decomposed ;-)

-Tucker Taft   stt@inmet.com   http://www.inmet.com/~stt/
Intermetrics, Inc.  Cambridge, MA  USA