From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a6dbac911d455814 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-12 09:15:36 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!news-in-sanjose!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9sookc$d83$1@neptunium.btinternet.com> Subject: Re: looking for a fast re-usable non-pointer data structure .... Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 12:15:15 EST Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 17:15:15 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16342 Date: 2001-11-12T17:15:15+00:00 List-Id: In article <9sookc$d83$1@neptunium.btinternet.com>, Tony Gair says... >Any ideas, has anyone used an avl tree as a remote protected objected >object with the distributed annex, >Should I dump the annex...or the avl tree Its probably just a matter of properly defining the stream attributes for your AVL tree so that the distributed annex can use them. But going through that process does not sound to me like a task for beginners or the faint-of-heart. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.