From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2866100c9a2b8ce7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Type conversion between access types (was: Free'ing extended
 types)
Date: 1996/05/21
Message-ID: <DrqL98.CC@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 155861530
references: <leschkes.832628057@ferret> <4nr20u$mv9@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-21T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <4nr20u$mv9@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU>,
Dale Stanbrough  <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU> wrote:
>Is new_ptr_package.ptr not type convertible with y.ptr?

No, it is not convertible.  If you add "all", then it is.

>Is it likely that compilers would use different storage pools for
>these two types?

No.

- Bob