From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9b39dbd8effaa623 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kst@thomsoft.com (Keith Thompson) Subject: Re: simple problem? Date: 1996/05/14 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 154743086 sender: news@thomsoft.com (USENET News Admin @flash) x-nntp-posting-host: pulsar references: organization: Thomson Software Products, San Diego, CA, USA newsgroups: comp.lang.ada originator: kst@pulsar Date: 1996-05-14T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In je@bton.ac.uk (John English) writes: [...] > Umm, this guy appears to me to be talking Ada 83 (which didn't allow > instantiation of Sequential_IO with an unconstrained type), not 95. Ada 83 doesn't specifically forbid instantiation of Sequential_IO (or Direct_IO, for that matter) with an unconstrained type. Whether it's actually allowed depends on the implementation. There's at least one Ada 83 implementation that allows Sequential_IO(String) but rejects Direct_IO(String). -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@thomsoft.com <*> TeleSoft^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Alsys^H^H^H^H^H Thomson Software Products 10251 Vista Sorrento Parkway, Suite 300, San Diego, CA, USA, 92121-2718 This sig uses the word "Exon" in violation of the Communications Decency Act.