From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea4f04ec8d41f5b7
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: stt@henning.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft)
Subject: Re: Ada83 equivalents for Ada95
Date: 1996/05/11
Message-ID: <Dr8t0K.Hy8.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 154289961
sender: news@inmet.camb.inmet.com (USENET news)
x-nntp-posting-host: henning.camb.inmet.com
references: <4n00nj$130@news1.delphi.com>
organization: Intermetrics, Inc.
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-05-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In <31927190.35AA@csehp3.mdc.com> James A. Squire asked:
>Has anybody gone to the trouble of translating code that uses features
>new to Ada95 back into its Ada83 equivalent?  If anyone knows of such
>examples that are available on the Internet, please let me know (email

Norm Cohen's new book on Ada includes some descriptions of how
to use Ada 83 features to accomplish the same goal as certain of
the new Ada 95 features.

-Tucker Taft   stt@inmet.com   http://www.inmet.com/~stt/
Intermetrics, Inc.  Cambridge, MA  USA