From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5eeb9329d556031f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Subject: Re: help - bit twiddling anomoly Date: 1996/05/11 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 154217341 references: <3193C6C3.7FEC@ccgate.hac.com> organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-05-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <3193C6C3.7FEC@ccgate.hac.com>, Dave Wright wrote: >Any ideas why the following code behaves strangely ... Because it's not indented properly. >type onebit is record >bit1: integer range 0..1; >end record; >for onebit'size use 1; >pragma bit_pack(onebit); > >type fourteenbit is record >value: integer range 0..16383; >end record; >for fourteenbit'size use 14; >... :-) / 2 - Bob