From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac5c3bc59168d76
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Subprogram Renaming
Date: 1996/04/13
Message-ID: <DprxrI.Dp3@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 147215714
references: <md5:FE4AB546A8392541EDC1E3FE12E3D8AF>
 <4kjhg2$139s@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> <316E12F2.37BC@ehs.ericsson.se>
 <4kmgha$139s@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4kmgha$139s@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>,
Norman H. Cohen <ncohen@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
>       procedure Remove_All (Stack: in out Stack_Type)
>          renames Parent_Remove_All;
>          -- Inherited from Inner.Remove_All

Why not just:

      procedure Remove_All (Stack: in out Stack_Type)
         renames Inner.Remove_All;

?

- Bob