From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,703ebe6e4ca7960a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: scott@hakuin.boeing.com (Scott Moody, 773-8600)
Subject: Re: Linking C++ and Ada
Date: 1996/02/26
Message-ID: <DnE8s6.J5n@plato.ds.boeing.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 141256889
sender: news@plato.ds.boeing.com
references: <Dn6KEE.Mt2@news.thomson-lcr.fr>
organization: Boeing Defense and Space Group
reply-to: scott@hakuin.boeing.com
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-02-26T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>check the GNAT examples included in the distribution, there is an example
>about calling some C++ code.

This brings up a question. GNAT has a few pragmas for linking
to C++ that are not part of the Ada standard. I haven't even
seen them until looking at the ex6 example. Should I start using
these non-standard pragmas? It would definitely help my corba interface...

eg.

pragma CPP_Class (Entity => A);
pragma CPP_Vtable (Entity => A, Vtable_Ptr => Vptr, Entry_Count => 2);
pragma CPP_Constructor (Entity => Constructor);