From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,9ac62ca34a465706 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ac62ca34a465706 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: je@bton.ac.uk (John English) Subject: Re: on OO differnces between Ada95 and C++ Date: 1996/02/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 141190989 references: <4gbq7q$g08@qualcomm.com> organization: University of Brighton, UK newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1996-02-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Gene Ouye (geneo@rational.com) wrote: : If you're interested in religious language flame wars, you could : say that this is a case where Ada doesn't to what is expected. But : if you understand what the subtype declaration really does, then this : behavior really should be expected. In other words, whether you're : doing C++ or Ada, you can't expect the language subtleties to be : "expected" unless you get some education. Ooooooh! :-) -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- John English , Dept. of Computing, University of Brighton "Disks are divided into sex and tractors..." ----------------------------------------------------------------------------