From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2ea02452876a15e1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff)
Subject: Re: Choice of OO primitives in Ada95
Date: 1996/02/24
Message-ID: <Dn9CFJ.LuB@world.std.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140862309
references: <milodDn52IE.F5L@netcom.com> <Dn5K6K.8zI@assip.csasyd.oz>
organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-02-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <Dn5K6K.8zI@assip.csasyd.oz>,
Don Harrison <donh@syd.csa.com.au> wrote:
>John DiCamillo wrote:
>
>[objective arguments about class encapsulation]
>
>Thank you. I was beginning to wonder whether there was anyone else in this forum
>willing to discard their preconceived ideas and able to think objectively on
>this subject.

Now, now.  We were having a nice technical discussion, and then you go
and insult everybody who happens to disagree with you.  Yes, it *is*
insulting to say that because I disagree with you, I'm stuck on
preconceived ideas, and I am unable to think objectively.  Grr.
Is this whole thing just a troll, as somebody else suggested elsewhere
in this thread?  Do you want it to devolve into the usual religious
language flame war, complete with ad-hominem arguments?  If so, I don't
particularly want to participate.

- Bob