From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 1014db,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df854b5838c3e14
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: ark@research.att.com (Andrew Koenig)
Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
Date: 1996/02/20
Message-ID: <Dn3Krz.6yw@research.att.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 140378885
references: <312515DF.7D3B@cmlj.demon.co.uk> <4gad29$ddp@druid.borland.com>
 <4gb4r3$psg@qualcomm.com>
organization: AT&T Research, Murray Hill NJ
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Date: 1996-02-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <4gb4r3$psg@qualcomm.com> x!news.be.innet.net!INbe.net!usenet writes:

> Given 2 equally good programmers one in C++ and one in Ada, most 
> people will agree that Ada code is easier to read than the C++ code.

Most?  I have yet to meet anyone who knows both Ada and C++
well enough to be able to make a reasoned comparison.
-- 
				--Andrew Koenig
				  ark@research.att.com