From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,699cc914522aa7c4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:38:55 -0600
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <eog0g5$2bn$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
 <1168881460.179633.196040@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
 <eoi4fg$to8$1@cernne03.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Structured exception information
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:39:52 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807
Message-ID: <Db2dnS019PidyTDYnZ2dnUVZ_qKknZ2d@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-VVS5vwS5NE9jQ8QS1G+HTUXFs6TXzj/1VV8kTQEybC+ZlwhHm73Y0IlpyCGZqv6+5mg01RaytztC3JK!qwTOt2Nx266KGA3BqPc5rAdQAgz4xBDQRZjhp9Xdvch3HlltF394KiSJtgiVpIk7Wt5gse16usia!h4g/HuVXIKBqqg==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8204
Date: 2007-01-16T16:39:52-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Maciej Sobczak" <no.spam@no.spam.com> wrote in message
news:eoi4fg$to8$1@cernne03.cern.ch...
> claude.simon@equipement.gouv.fr wrote:
...
> It should be impossible to create X in any other way - this is the exact
> effect that I want to achieve.
>
> My compiler does not like it (but it's not really Ada2005), so I cannot
> verify it. Is the code above correct?

I think so, but since I don't have a new compiler to try it on, either, I
can't say for absolutely certain.

> BTW - in the line marked as NOTE the compiler says that aggregate type
> cannot be limited. Is it true for Ada2005?

No, aggregates can be defined for limited types, just like functions can be
defined for limited types. That's all new.

                       Randy.