From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5799fe4f91b50de
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:20:34 -0600
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <fealnc.6t.ln@127.0.0.1> <sa43bz1v6a1.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
 <41a38ae3$0$43611$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net>
Subject: Re: Possible Memory Leak
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 15:21:51 -0600
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Message-ID: <DaCdnXi08L4_ND7cRVn-hw@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-ds41Q/OoZWvqVu71P/iNTYZkVPCR7CYXi2e7xAAnA/SEJ3BoBrbq5RWjVyWFkB8AslqLrh16YnNubbP!7BRYmNsxEsh7lpGaYs5fFbDzf+Imw3sGOeYF0K4F83chImZ6bvY8bobx/OrJS6Vmc1LYhafdAKQN
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.20
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6395
Date: 2004-11-23T15:21:51-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"RAMatthews" <ramatthews@noone.nowhere> wrote in message
news:41a38ae3$0$43611$ed2e19e4@ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net...
> But note that its the ARM's wording that bothers me (my
> code works OK with GNAT).
>
> It was on noticing those paragraphs (7.6(21.x)) that made
> me wonder if my code might encounter a problem with a
> different compiler - and indeed whether the Standard is
> correct.

A general remark: if you have a problem with the wording of the Standard,
it's always a good idea to check the cross-reference listing of AIs to see
if there is already an issue open for the paragraph in question. That way,
you can see if you have found something new, or are just rediscovering an
already known issue. See http://www.ada-auth.org/AI-XREF.HTML#Section .

                Randy Brukardt
                ARG Editor