From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 102b75,501ec19d1d81daee X-Google-Attributes: gid102b75,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,db9a11afb3da4240 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-29 19:38:46 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Language support for flexible handling of system-detected errors. Date: 29 Mar 2002 21:38:24 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1017459507 1588 192.135.80.34 (30 Mar 2002 03:38:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 03:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.arch:26147 comp.lang.ada:21879 Date: 2002-03-29T21:38:24-06:00 List-Id: In article , "Marin David Condic" writes: > Given that this started with talk about *compilers* having a CLI versus a > GUI based point-n-click interface, I'd like to know if there is a commercial > development compiler out there that *doesn't* provide a means of invoking it > from the command line. The ones I've seen usually have some means of running > the compiler from an MS_DOS window or a Unix command line. Given that much, > I'd think you could build a batch file to do compilations, right? Obviously Think Pascal cannot be invoked from the command line, because there is no command line provided by the operating system. The competing Macintosh Programmer's Workshop from Apple provided a command line interface just for the purpose of running compilers :-)