From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,85c4b961f840b5ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!nwrdny01.gnilink.net.POSTED!0f19ed38!not-for-mail From: "Frank J. Lhota" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <2oUEc.2$S77.1@nwrdny03.gnilink.net> <2kimpdF2orakU1@uni-berlin.de> <1088697459.558708@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> Subject: Re: Zero length Objects X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 15:02:59 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.154.250.122 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrdny01.gnilink.net 1088780579 141.154.250.122 (Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:02:59 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 11:02:59 EDT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2049 Date: 2004-07-02T15:02:59+00:00 List-Id: This is what I love about this NG. In the thread "A simple ADA puzzle", we had an interesting and informative discussion of how a compiler should handle a type whose objects may be billions of bytes long. Now in this thread, we are having an equally enlightening discussion of types whose objects are potentially zero bytes long. Looks like we have covered both ends of the spectrum!