From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be23df8e7e275d73
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-08 06:03:32 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!proxad.net!feeder2-1.proxad.net!nnrp4.proxad.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "nicolas" <n.brunot@cadwin.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <mailman.995648003.8404.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
   <9kea9a$lsc$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9keduf$qvc$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <Reza7.18403$px7.4304991@nnrp1.proxad.net>
 <9kelv1$riq$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <dVsb7.5035$2i4.5346431@nnrp6.proxad.net> <ulmkxuy80.fsf@wanadoo.fr>
 <bFxb7.6327$bO7.5653610@nnrp6.proxad.net> <un15dgn63.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <JHNb7.7167$2j2.5927018@nnrp6.proxad.net>
 <kcOb7.4612$e%4.140534@news3.oke.nextra.no>
 <YpOb7.13370$II7.2424964@nnrp4.proxad.net>
 <y%Ob7.737$ep5.11352@news1.okOrganization: LJK Software
 <uiGL0WHzXluf@eisner.encompasserve.org>
Subject: Re: More Uniform Ada libraries (was: Proving Correctness)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Message-ID: <DMac7.86$E96.95326@nnrp4.proxad.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 13:03:31 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.101.131.241
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
X-Trace: nnrp4.proxad.net 997275811 195.101.131.241 (Wed,
 08 Aug 2001 15:03:31 CEST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2001 15:03:31 CEST
Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11608
Date: 2001-08-08T13:03:31+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam> a �crit dans le
message news: uiGL0WHzXluf@eisner.encompasserve.org...
> But you seem to feel there is a workable business model to achieve
> uniformity across all Ada compilers, while the rest of us are less
confident.

The business model is not my problem, and I don't have feelings about it.
The only feelings I have is that there are some customer side requirements,
coming from the reasons why we, and most Ada projects I know, made the Ada
choice about 12 years ago.
Our projects, and most projects I know, have nothing to do with embedded
systems and 'DOD similar' projects.
I don't believe that satisfying (for me) Ada solutions will be available in
the future, if those requirements are not fulfilled.
We have to know if we will be the last Ada users to have concerns, which are
not embedded systems and 'DOD similar' projects concerns.
If this is the case, we don't feel like fighting with Ada solution providers
which don't want to understand anything about what we need, and deliberately
ignore any other market's rules.