From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,93ab7fc5388e249
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-05 10:31:16 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!in.nntp.be!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
References: <DzdP7.48986$xS6.81471@www.newsranger.com>
 <3C0E1E7E.CA7113F4@brighton.ac.uk> <kjrP7.49771$xS6.82061@www.newsranger.com>
 <9ulni1$d58$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Subject: Re: List container strawman 1.3
Message-ID: <DJtP7.49965$xS6.82807@www.newsranger.com>
X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please
X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or
X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:30:59 EST
Organization: http://www.newsranger.com
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 18:30:59 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17461
Date: 2001-12-05T18:30:59+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <9ulni1$d58$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>, Georg Bauhaus says...
>
>Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> wrote:
>
>:  Lists.Insert
>:     (Target      => Car_List,
>:      New_Element => Honda,
>:      List_End    => Lists.Front);
>
>Will "List_End" not be confusing if the abstract data type
>is used for something other than a list?

Perhaps, although I'd expect the package to typically be named something with
the word "List" in it, so its already there. 

The problem here is that the logical name seemed to be "End", but that's a
reserved word. Perhaps we should use "Side"?

---
T.E.D.    homepage   - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html

No trees were killed in the sending of this message. 
However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.