From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,27e56580ae0c3b7d X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-23 11:14:05 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!lnewspeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!server1.netnews.ja.net!pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk!not-for-mail From: Matthew Woodcraft Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT for Debian Date: 23 Jul 2003 19:09:29 +0100 (BST) Organization: Linux Unlimited Message-ID: References: <404ee0af.0307211056.15324da@posting.google.com> <20030722165245.15f880a2.david@realityrift.com> <20030723125549.1336a07f.david@realityrift.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: rapun.sel.cam.ac.uk Originator: mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk ([193.201.200.170]) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:40716 Date: 2003-07-23T19:09:29+01:00 List-Id: David Holm wrote: >But GNU decides what to accept from ACTs patches and what not to >accept. They do not blindly apply code that come from ACT. Since ACT >is striving for maximum Ada stability it is likely that when >GNU-people remove code they will go further away from that goal or >otherwise there would be no need for separate codebases. At the moment, there are two separate trees because ACT aren't submitting patches to gcc, not because the gcc people are refusing patches. -M-