From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b0123581076a0cf3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-09-08 12:18:03 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sunic!news.lth.se!nic.lth.se!dag
From: dag@control.lth.se (Dag Bruck)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada ad in Embedded Systems Programming stinks
Date: 08 Sep 1994 17:12:57 GMT
Organization: Department of Automatic Control, Lund, Sweden
Message-ID: <DAG.94Sep8191257@bellman.control.lth.se>
References: <CvFI4J.D5M@world.std.com> <34ecqc$b5q@source.asset.com>
	<34g5v3INN6q2@phage.cshl.org> <EACHUS.94Sep6094018@spectre.mitre.org>
	<DAG.94Sep8090447@bellman.control.lth.se>
	<EACHUS.94Sep8095216@spectre.mitre.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: control.lth.se
In-reply-to: eachus@spectre.mitre.org's message of 8 Sep 94 09:52:16
Date: 1994-09-08T17:12:57+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>>>>> "RE" == Robert I Eachus <eachus@spectre.mitre.org> writes:

RE> I have found several areas
RE> where C is a better implementation language than Ada.

What areas, he asked curiously...  I would be greatly interested in a
discussion of things that C does better than Ada, in particular from
someone whose understanding of Ada is beyond doubt.

					-- Dag Bruck