From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,319ef0454c7765d5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) Subject: Re: Why no exception hierarchy ? Date: 1995/04/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 100939369 references: <3ksv4s$f9e@news.uni-c.dk> <1995Mar28.115614.9511@eisner> <3ls5sb$nl8@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> organization: The World Public Access UNIX, Brookline, MA newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1995-04-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , Jean D. Ichbiah wrote: >Since when have you become an adept of the Soviet practice of >rewriting history? There is no such thing as Ada 83: it is called >Ada. Moreover, look at the cover of the new standard and as >far as I can read it refers to a language called Ada 95! Jean, The title of the ISO standard is "Information Technology -- Programming languages -- Ada". No "95" there. A different cover was added to the version that was sent out by the Ada 9X office. The Foreword says, "This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 8652:1987), of which it constitutes a technical revision." So as far as ISO is concerned, "Ada" refers to the 1995 version of the language. (Also, as far as ISO is concerned, Ada 83 is really Ada 87!) - Bob